Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology ; 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-20236702

RESUMEN

Objective To develop a new method for reliable and rapid determination of the fitness of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern. Methods Competition experiments between two SARS-CoV-2 variants were performed in cells of the upper (nasal human airway epithelium) and lower (Calu-3 cells) respiratory tracts followed by quantification of variant ratios by droplet digital reverse transcription (ddRT)-PCR. Results In competition experiments, the delta variant outcompeted the alpha variant in both cells of the upper and lower respiratory tracts. A 50/50% mixture of delta and omicron variants indicated a predominance of omicron in the upper respiratory tract whereas delta predominated in the lower respiratory tract. There was no evidence of recombination events between variants in competition as assessed by whole gene sequencing. Conclusion Differential replication kinetics were shown between variants of concern which may explain, at least partly, the emergence and disease severity associated with new SARS-CoV-2 variants.

2.
Cell Rep ; 42(1): 111998, 2023 01 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2177163

RESUMEN

Several severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron subvariants have recently emerged, becoming the dominant circulating strains in many countries. These variants contain a large number of mutations in their spike glycoprotein, raising concerns about vaccine efficacy. In this study, we evaluate the ability of plasma from a cohort of individuals that received three doses of mRNA vaccine to recognize and neutralize these Omicron subvariant spikes. We observed that BA.4/5 and BQ.1.1 spikes are markedly less recognized and neutralized compared with the D614G and other Omicron subvariant spikes tested. Also, individuals who have been infected before or after vaccination present better humoral responses than SARS-CoV-2-naive vaccinated individuals, thus indicating that hybrid immunity generates better humoral responses against these subvariants.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas Sintéticas , Mutación , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes
3.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 11(2)2023 Jan 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2200989

RESUMEN

The Omicron BQ.1.1 variant is now the major SARS-CoV-2 circulating strain in many countries. Because of the many mutations present in its Spike glycoprotein, this variant is resistant to humoral responses elicited by monovalent mRNA vaccines. With the goal to improve immune responses against Omicron subvariants, bivalent mRNA vaccines have recently been approved in several countries. In this study, we measure the capacity of plasma from vaccinated individuals, before and after a fourth dose of mono- or bivalent mRNA vaccine, to recognize and neutralize the ancestral (D614G) and the BQ.1.1 Spikes. Before and after the fourth dose, we observe a significantly better recognition and neutralization of the ancestral Spike. We also observe that fourth-dose vaccinated individuals who have been recently infected better recognize and neutralize the BQ.1.1 Spike, independently of the mRNA vaccine used, than donors who have never been infected or have an older infection. Our study supports that hybrid immunity, generated by vaccination and a recent infection, induces higher humoral responses than vaccination alone, independently of the mRNA vaccine used.

4.
Viruses ; 14(10)2022 09 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2066552

RESUMEN

SARS-CoV-2 continues to infect millions of people worldwide. The subvariants arising from the variant-of-concern (VOC) Omicron include BA.1, BA.1.1, BA.2, BA.2.12.1, BA.4, and BA.5. All possess multiple mutations in their Spike glycoprotein, notably in its immunogenic receptor-binding domain (RBD), and present enhanced viral transmission. The highly mutated Spike glycoproteins from these subvariants present different degrees of resistance to recognition and cross-neutralisation by plasma from previously infected and/or vaccinated individuals. We have recently shown that the temperature affects the interaction between the Spike and its receptor, the angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). The affinity of RBD for ACE2 is significantly increased at lower temperatures. However, whether this is also observed with the Spike of Omicron and sub-lineages is not known. Here we show that, similar to other variants, Spikes from Omicron sub-lineages bind better the ACE2 receptor at lower temperatures. Whether this translates into enhanced transmission during the fall and winter seasons remains to be determined.


Asunto(s)
Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina 2 , COVID-19 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Temperatura , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/metabolismo , Peptidil-Dipeptidasa A/metabolismo , Mutación
5.
Cell Rep ; 38(9): 110429, 2022 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1734242

RESUMEN

Continuous emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) is fueling the COVID-19 pandemic. Omicron (B.1.1.529) rapidly spread worldwide. The large number of mutations in its Spike raise concerns about a major antigenic drift that could significantly decrease vaccine efficacy and infection-induced immunity. A long interval between BNT162b2 mRNA doses elicits antibodies that efficiently recognize Spikes from different VOCs. Here, we evaluate the recognition of Omicron Spike by plasma from a cohort of SARS-CoV-2 naive and previously infected individuals who received their BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine 16 weeks apart. Omicron Spike is recognized less efficiently than D614G, Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and Delta Spikes. We compare with plasma activity from participants receiving a short (4 weeks) interval regimen. Plasma from individuals of the long-interval cohort recognize and neutralize better the Omicron Spike compared with those who received a short interval. Whether this difference confers any clinical benefit against Omicron remains unknown.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/sangre , Vacuna BNT162/administración & dosificación , Esquemas de Inmunización , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/inmunología , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/análisis , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/análisis , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Vacuna BNT162/inmunología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Células HEK293 , Humanos , Inmunización Secundaria/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Quebec , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad , Factores de Tiempo , Vacunación/métodos , Potencia de la Vacuna , Vacunas Sintéticas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Sintéticas/inmunología , Adulto Joven , Vacunas de ARNm/administración & dosificación , Vacunas de ARNm/inmunología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA